The Biggest Project Risk You’re Ignoring

The Biggest Project Risk You’re Ignoring

clarity

Sammye brings a unique blend of cross-industry expertise to her role as Program Manager at IA. During her career, Sammye has developed a keen understanding of business operations, technology and organization development. Sammye worked for a number of years at Cherokee Nation, where she led critical IT implementation initiatives and program management efforts.

Project Execution, Project Governance

When companies bring us in to lead a project or program, it’s often because something is stuck. The strategy is sound, resources are in place, and people are working hard, but progress is slow, inconsistent, or stalling altogether.

Nine times out of ten, the issue isn’t commitment or capability. It’s clarity.

Clarity of scope and outcomes is the foundation of successful delivery. Without it, even the most talented teams waste energy chasing different definitions of success. Work gets duplicated. Priorities conflict. Momentum fades.

I’ve seen this play out in organizations of all sizes, but especially in companies that are growing quickly or navigating change. In fast-moving environments, there’s often a rush to action. Everyone’s eager to deliver. But when you move too fast without pausing to align on the basics (What are we really doing? Why? And what does success look like?) you’re setting yourself up for confusion and churn later.

The Danger of Assumed Alignment

The biggest trap I see isn’t overt disagreement, it’s assumed alignment. At kickoff, everyone nods in agreement about the high-level summary of what the program is trying to achieve. But if I pull five stakeholders aside and ask them to define scope or describe success, I’ll usually get five different answers.

That disconnect isn’t intentional. It’s a natural byproduct of complex organizations with shifting priorities, and the sheer pace of business. If eft unaddressed, delivery slows and there is the risk of rework – both of which can erode trust.

That’s why I treat clarity as more than a checkbox at the beginning of a project. It’s a living discipline, and one I return to regularly throughout an initiative.

Clarity in Action

When reflecting on past projects and programs, many examples come to mind where re-alignment of scope and outcomes was critical. On one, we’d just hit our first MVP delivery milestone, a major achievement. But in the time it took to get there, a lot had changed. Key participants rolled off. New technology capabilities came online. Business priorities shifted. Customer needs evolved.

If we approached the next phase of delivery based solely on the beat of the original drum, we’d be marching in the wrong direction. Taking a moment to recalibrate by getting the entire team aligned and crystal clear on the updated scope, outcomes, and success measures, was a worthwhile pause. It set us up for the next phase with purpose, rather than momentum for momentum’s sake.

An Approach to Drive Clarity

Whenever you step into a new engagement, begin by asking what might seem like overly simple questions:

  • What exactly are we trying to achieve?
  • How will we know when we’ve succeeded?
  • What’s in scope, and equally important, what’s out?
  • Who owns which decisions?
  • Are we aligned on priorities across teams?
  • Who else in the organization may already be doing something similar or related?

These conversations often reveal hidden assumptions or conflicting expectations, long before they show up as roadblocks. Once clarity is reached, be sure to document it clearly and visibly. Everyone should be able to point to the same definition of success.

For Programs, Clarity Is Even More Critical

Program work requires a wider lens. With multiple projects running in parallel, each with its own owners, teams, and deliverables, there’s a real risk of misalignment between the trees and the forest.

That’s why, when I lead programs, I embed clarity into the governance model. We build in checkpoints to revisit whether project-level outcomes still support the broader business strategy. And if the strategy shifts, which it often does, we adjust scope and sequencing consciously, not reactively.

Without that alignment, programs drift. With it, they accelerate.

Clarity Creates Confidence

When people know exactly what they’re working toward, and what success looks like, they show up differently. They make better decisions. They take ownership. Meetings become more focused. Accountability becomes clearer.

Clarity also makes it easier to say no. Scope creep becomes a conscious decision, not something that sneaks in through side conversations or shifting expectations.

And when conflicts or confusion arise, you have something to come back to: a clear, shared understanding that was built collaboratively and deliberately.

A Pause with Purpose

Some organizations fear that taking time to define scope and outcomes will slow things down. I see it the opposite way. Clarity prevents the kind of slowdowns that happen when teams are misaligned, distracted, or pulled in different directions.

That pause for clarity, whether at the start or midstream, pays back tenfold in saved time, cleaner execution, and better outcomes. Without clarity, even the best strategies turn into noise. But with it, teams can move forward with confidence, speed, and purpose.

Share this post

FacebookTwitterLinkedInEmail

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

clarity

Sammye Walton

Project Execution, Project Governance

FacebookTwitterLinkedInEmail

When companies bring us in to lead a project or program, it’s often because something is stuck. The strategy is sound, resources are in place, and people are working hard, but progress is slow, inconsistent, or stalling altogether.

Nine times out of ten, the issue isn’t commitment or capability. It’s clarity.

Clarity of scope and outcomes is the foundation of successful delivery. Without it, even the most talented teams waste energy chasing different definitions of success. Work gets duplicated. Priorities conflict. Momentum fades.

I’ve seen this play out in organizations of all sizes, but especially in companies that are growing quickly or navigating change. In fast-moving environments, there’s often a rush to action. Everyone’s eager to deliver. But when you move too fast without pausing to align on the basics (What are we really doing? Why? And what does success look like?) you’re setting yourself up for confusion and churn later.

The Danger of Assumed Alignment

The biggest trap I see isn’t overt disagreement, it’s assumed alignment. At kickoff, everyone nods in agreement about the high-level summary of what the program is trying to achieve. But if I pull five stakeholders aside and ask them to define scope or describe success, I’ll usually get five different answers.

That disconnect isn’t intentional. It’s a natural byproduct of complex organizations with shifting priorities, and the sheer pace of business. If eft unaddressed, delivery slows and there is the risk of rework – both of which can erode trust.

That’s why I treat clarity as more than a checkbox at the beginning of a project. It’s a living discipline, and one I return to regularly throughout an initiative.

Clarity in Action

When reflecting on past projects and programs, many examples come to mind where re-alignment of scope and outcomes was critical. On one, we’d just hit our first MVP delivery milestone, a major achievement. But in the time it took to get there, a lot had changed. Key participants rolled off. New technology capabilities came online. Business priorities shifted. Customer needs evolved.

If we approached the next phase of delivery based solely on the beat of the original drum, we’d be marching in the wrong direction. Taking a moment to recalibrate by getting the entire team aligned and crystal clear on the updated scope, outcomes, and success measures, was a worthwhile pause. It set us up for the next phase with purpose, rather than momentum for momentum’s sake.

An Approach to Drive Clarity

Whenever you step into a new engagement, begin by asking what might seem like overly simple questions:

  • What exactly are we trying to achieve?
  • How will we know when we’ve succeeded?
  • What’s in scope, and equally important, what’s out?
  • Who owns which decisions?
  • Are we aligned on priorities across teams?
  • Who else in the organization may already be doing something similar or related?

These conversations often reveal hidden assumptions or conflicting expectations, long before they show up as roadblocks. Once clarity is reached, be sure to document it clearly and visibly. Everyone should be able to point to the same definition of success.

For Programs, Clarity Is Even More Critical

Program work requires a wider lens. With multiple projects running in parallel, each with its own owners, teams, and deliverables, there’s a real risk of misalignment between the trees and the forest.

That’s why, when I lead programs, I embed clarity into the governance model. We build in checkpoints to revisit whether project-level outcomes still support the broader business strategy. And if the strategy shifts, which it often does, we adjust scope and sequencing consciously, not reactively.

Without that alignment, programs drift. With it, they accelerate.

Clarity Creates Confidence

When people know exactly what they’re working toward, and what success looks like, they show up differently. They make better decisions. They take ownership. Meetings become more focused. Accountability becomes clearer.

Clarity also makes it easier to say no. Scope creep becomes a conscious decision, not something that sneaks in through side conversations or shifting expectations.

And when conflicts or confusion arise, you have something to come back to: a clear, shared understanding that was built collaboratively and deliberately.

A Pause with Purpose

Some organizations fear that taking time to define scope and outcomes will slow things down. I see it the opposite way. Clarity prevents the kind of slowdowns that happen when teams are misaligned, distracted, or pulled in different directions.

That pause for clarity, whether at the start or midstream, pays back tenfold in saved time, cleaner execution, and better outcomes. Without clarity, even the best strategies turn into noise. But with it, teams can move forward with confidence, speed, and purpose.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Check out a few other IA articles

Scroll to Top